Climate targets vs Industrial policy - can we do both?

NEWS Published

EU EU has committed itself to promote the role of industry and its competitiveness. Which target or targets for energy and climate policy should be set - only one for CO2 emissions or do we also need a renewables target? Do we need targets for competitiveness and security of supply? These and other questions were on the table at a seminar in the European Parliament organised by the Swedish Society for Business and Politics (SPN).

spn 16 9

Jonas Berggren, head of Swedish Enterprise Brussels office, opens the SPN-seminar on "Climate target(s) vs industrial policy - can we do both?".

The global energy landscape is changing rapidly. Energy prices are increasing and the gap between Europe and other regions are increasing. Shale gas has revolutionised the American energy market, with prices now 50 percent lower in the US than in Europe. Germany is phasing out its nuclear power by 2022. 90 percent of all carbon emissions now come from outside the EU.

The European Commission is about to propose a new framework for EU’s climate energy and policy. At the same time as new binding targets are discussed. Which target or targets should be set?

Maria Sunér Fleming, Director for Climate and Energy Policy at the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise, wanted to combine high ambitions for decarbonisation with a highly competitive energy policy for the future.

– Both the climate challenge and securing competitiveness and growth are urgent matters. There is an energy revolution going on and Europe is losing ground. The costs of energy in Europe are becoming higher than in other regions and according to the IEA, the gap is widening. Cost efficient, affordable and reliable energy is rapidly becoming more important for the competitiveness of European industry. The situation is worrying as the trend today is that investments are moving out of Europe. By letting the concept of carbon leakage cover also the gradually lower re-investment levels and decisions to start new plants in other parts of the world, we would measure an ongoing decrease of competitiveness for the EU as an industrial region, she said.

For Maria Sunér Fleming it was key to keep and develop Europe’s comparative advantages.

– Investment decisions for global companies are based on several factors, such as closeness to markets and suppliers, infrastructure and access to qualified labour, but especially for energy-intensive companies, the price of energy is becoming an increasingly important factor. This must be addressed when the future energy and climate policy is now being formulated. We need competitive costs for energy, cost efficiency, stability of grids and diversification as well as lowered emissions and an effective use of resources. The way forward includes the use of one target, one on CO2, but focus and concrete targets are also needed for competitiveness and security of supply, said Sunér Fleming.

Britta Thomsen, MEP from the S&D Group and shadow rapporteur of the European Parliament’s response to the Energy Roadmap for 2030, agreed that Europe’s main challenges today are energy prices on that rise, the shale gas revolution in the US but also the lack of own energy sources, which were all having an impact on the competitiveness of European industry. Despite this, she saw a need for more binding and tighter targets.

– Without binding climate targets there will never be any commitment and hence, no progress. Such targets could also serve to create a stable framework, which would be conducive for investment decisions. The new 2030 framework for climate and energy policies should include three separate targets. Energy efficiency should be improved by 40 percent, energy from renewable energy sources should make up for 35 percent of the total and CO2 emissions should be reduced by 95 percent by until 2050, said Britta Thomsen.

Tom Howes, deputy head of unit in DG Energy of the European Commission said that more attention has to be given to competitiveness aspects, especially now after the crisis, but questioned how the rising energy costs could be tackled.

– Since many elements of the energy price were external and difficult to alter, ultimately we have to ask ourselves which kind of industrial structure we want to have, he said.

He also elaborated on the upcoming communication from the European Commission, to be presented in January 2014, and on the need for new targets.

– The initiative will frame energy and climate policies for the period up to 2030. It will provide a long-term perspective for investments, a more sustainable, secure and competitive EU energy system and ensure that the EU stays on track to meet the climate and energy objectives. What we need is a more European approach than before. The Single Market has gained in importance since 2007. We also need to give more attention to competitiveness. It is too early to reveal if the commission will propose one, two or three new targets, but as far as the theme of this seminar is concerned - if we can do both climate targets and industrial policy - the answer is yes, we have to, Howes concluded.

The seminar was held in the European Parliament. It gathered around 60 participants from the European institutions, business organisations, individual companies and other stakeholders. It was moderated by Jonas Berggren, head of the Brussels Office of the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.


NEWS Published:

OECDs ambassadors meeting – act for growth and prosperity

January 19th marked the date for BIACs annual meeting with the ambassadors of OECD. This year’s theme was ”Business priorities for OECD action: a call for growth and prosperity” and tackled subjects like entrepreneurship, multilateral framework for trade, tax and investments, creating opportunities for business to create the jobs of the future and developing high quality regulation that strengthens businesses competitiveness. 
NEWS Published:

Trilogue negotiations – striking the right balance between transparency and efficiency

A trilogue is just what it sounds like – a dialogue between three parties. In a European context the three parties in question are the European parliament, the European Commission and the Council. There are advantages to these trilogues; it’s a quicker decision process which can be used ad hoc with the three most important parties present. But the opposition is growing against the increased frequency, particularly because of lack of transparency that trilogues entail.
NEWS Published:

Entrepreneurship crucial for successful companies in Europe

We need a holistic perspective to be able to create a better European ecosystem for entrepreneurs. Innovation is not enough, the products must be commercialised and reach the market if companies are to be able tocreate growth.
NEWS Published:

A framework for free flow of non-personal data in the European Union

COMMENT The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise welcomes this regulation with its aim to ensure the free data flow within the European Union. Europe can no longer afford to keep the Digital Single Market held back by protectionism and fragmentation, says Göran Norén, Head of Department, Industrial Affairs, and Carolina Brånby, Digital Policy expert.
NEWS Published:

Nordic labour market models and the Social Pillar – complementary or colliding?

SOCIAL PILLAR The Nordic employer organizations organised a seminar in Brussels where invited representatives from the EU institutions, industry and trade union discussed their views on the Social Pillar taking into account the Nordic labour market models.
NEWS Published:

Connected consumers: risk or opportunity?

New technology and data-driven innovation create new business models and services that enable companies to help their customers by adjusting their products and become more relevant. At the same time, access to and analysis of data challenges the personal integrity and the view of how integrity should best be safeguarded. How shall development of new services and personalisation be balanced with demands of personal integrity? Do consumers have access to relevant information? And who is responsible for what?
NEWS Published:

Business and politics hand in hand to solve environmental challenges

The world and humanity are facing some of our greatest challenges. More people are using more natural resources. Fish stocks are running the risk of extinction, freshwater resources are far from adequate, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is increasing and biodiversity is becoming depleted. Never before has a creature been able to affect our planet to the extent humanity does today.All of this constitutes major challenges - but there is hope for our future. And many solutions can be found within the business community.
NEWS Published:

The recipe for a competitive EU

The success of the EU’s can be measured largely in the level of exchange in goods, services, people, and capital. The complete implementation of the Single Market is key. Much remains to be done in many areas, such as the free movement of services and labour, eliminating restrictive national processes, regulations and standards, and ensuring that common legislation is applied uniformly and consistently. As long as barriers to the four freedoms remain, European competitiveness will continue to be held back.
NEWS Published:

Trump cannot kill climate hope

As the USA now plans to exit the Paris Climate agreement, the EU and Sweden can have the greatest impact by demonstrating that combining competitiveness and high levels of prosperity with continuing to reduce climate emissions is possible. The entrepreneurial sector will drive climate issues forward, more than policy makers. Technical innovation is advancing quickly in many fields, reducing costs for new technology. Even US President Donald Trump cannot change these facts despite his misguided passion for coal, writes Maria Sunér Fleming, Head of Energy and Climate Policy at the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.
NEWS Published:

Do we need a more social Europe?

Is a “Social Europe” the right medicine to stop growing populism? Can new social rights and social legislation foster growth and jobs? Is the fight against social dumping in fact a pretext for protecting domestic workers? What is the role of the EU and the Member States?
NEWS Published:

Trust in the European Union at a crossroads – Europaperspektiv 2017

Swedish universities have since 1998 cooperated in national networks within political science, economics and law. The purpose is to enhance the interest and knowledge in the European Union. Each year a book is published to disseminate knowledge to a broader audience. The book is divided into three main areas, political science, economics and law and each year grasps a specific topic. The topic of the year is trust, which incorporates trust both between member states but also between citizens and institutions.
NEWS Published:

How the Nordics achieved an integrated electricity market – Lessons for Europe?

Last November, the European Commission presented its package "Clean Energy for All in Europe". Among the proposals currently being discussed in the Council of Ministers and in the European Parliament are the draft legislation on the electricity market design, security of supply and governance of the energy union.
NEWS Published:

Close the ecocycle – recycling is better than burning

Anders Olsson is CEO for recovery business, Cassandra Oil, in Västerås, Sweden. He thinks that misdirected regulatory frameworks skew the way society manages plastic waste.
NEWS Published:

Free data flows in focus for the entrepreneurial sector

Global free trade, technical development and free data flows are entirely essential to export dependent Sweden. We are in the midst of a transformation to a thoroughly digitalised society where the possibilities for innovation are great and integrity needs equally great. Companies cannot conduct their business across national borders without moving data, as well – whether small or large, and in every industry. How can Sweden and Europe establish data-driven policy where all interests – personal, business, and societal needs – are preserved in the long term?
NEWS Published:

Plenty of red tape waiting to be cut

BETTER REGULATION Cutting red tape has long been a dream of Swedish companies. But the current coalition government (Social Democrats and the Green Party) has put little effort into this issue. Strong measures are needed now, argues a second report from the project A Challenged Sweden.
NEWS Published:

Red tape clogs the Single Market

RED TAPE Design and Lighting business, Watt & Veke, struggles with the administrative burden of selling to the EU Single Market. Right now, they’re having trouble with administering producer responsibility obligations and recycling electrical products. “Things are not as open as we would like,” says CEO Johan Pehrson.
NEWS Published:

Business community has an important role in the future EU

EU The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise and BusinessEurope remain active in working to impact the EU’s agenda for the future. “The way forward will build on its original ideas of openness, trade, and economic integration,” commented Jens Hedström in celebrating the Union’s 60th birthday.
NEWS Published:

Reaction to the UK’s decision to leave the EU

COMMENT “We regret that the UK Government has decided to take this step” says Director-General of the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise, Carola Lemne, “This is the beginning of a process entailing great risks for our companies and bringing few positive aspects with it”.
NEWS Published:

The VAT base and VAT rates - A contribution to the EU VAT Action Plan

TAXATION On the 7 of April 2016 the European Commission adopted the Action Plan on VAT - Towards a single EU VAT area. As a part of the action plan the Commission will present a proposal on VAT rates, with the aim of giving member states more freedom in this area. From a Swedish perspective this is the perfect time to further analyse and discuss how we want the VAT rules to be designed in the future.
NEWS Published:

Positive announcement on changed trading rules for emission allowances

EU The European Parliament voted on changes to the EU Emission Trading System for 2021 to 2030. The proposal includes an increase of emission allowances allocated free to industry, representing a victory for this globally competitive industry.