Nordic labour market models and the Social Pillar – complementary or colliding?

NEWS Published

SOCIAL PILLAR The Nordic employer organizations organised a seminar in Brussels where invited representatives from the EU institutions, industry and trade union discussed their views on the Social Pillar taking into account the Nordic labour market models.

Bild 2.

Can new social rights – as proposed in the Social Pillar – really foster sustainable growth and jobs in Europe? Is the approach of the EU Commission compatible with the already well-functioning Nordic labour markets and social dialogues? Is the cause of social and economic divergences in Europe due to a lack of social regulations and rights or is it found in a lack of competitiveness and structural reforms?

To discuss these topics, the Nordic employer organizations organised a seminar in Brussels where invited representatives from the EU institutions, industry and trade union discussed their views on the Social Pillar taking into account the Nordic labour market models. Among the panellists were Ruth Paserman, Deputy Head of Cabinet, European Commission; Ambassador Vibeke Pasternak Jørgensen, Permanent Representation of Denmark to the EU; Margrethe Husebø, Head of Employment Law and Employee Relations Sector, Statoil ASA; Markus Penttinen, Head of International Affairs, Akava; Gunnar Hökmark, Member of the European Parliament, EPP Group and Morten Løkkegaard, Member of the European Parliament, ALDE Group. The seminar was moderated by Jorge Valero, journalist.

Ruth Paserman started the discussion by stating that the idea behind the Social Pillar is to have a fitness check of the current legal framework, to identify and fill existing gaps to meet future social challenges. Gaps should be counteracted by means of access to adequate social protection, equal opportunities and gender balance. Paserman furthermore stated that the 20 principles accompanying the Social Pillar could be tools for this progress however, social partners’ voice is important since these principles are foremost considered national competence which is why the EU Commission also has made the offer to go into dialogue on this issue.
– There is no interest in creating a common European labour market model, but some things can be improved and the social partners play an important role in the social legislative work, Paserman highlighted.

Vibeke Pasternak Jørgensen underlined that there is a need for reform to future-proof the labour market, but that the Nordic approaches works smoothly characterizing less governmental interventions leaving social partners to work out the practical arrangements and agreements. For this reason, the Danish government would like to emphasize that the Social Pillar is not a legally binding document but plays a role in setting out the political vision in Europe.
– The Social Pillar will be supported in the Council, though it is vital to support the division of competences. It is essential that the Social Pillar does not collide with national – and Nordic – models, said Pasternak Jørgensen.

Gunnar Hökmark asked whether there is a European social model, in the light of the various labour market models taking place in Eastern Europe, Southern Europe as well as United Kingdom and Ireland. The Nordic countries have their own too. Figures show that the situation is very different in terms of employment rate, wages, workers participation, gender balance and childcare benefits.
– I am positive that 28 Pillars are both more stable and effective than one joint Pillar, since they are based on existing conditions and traditions in each Member State. Also, European legislation is about finding compromises, we cannot propose a European track if we are not prepared to compromise, Hökmark put forward.

Hökmark furthermore stated that there is a need for common legislation of the EU internal market, but what regards social legislation, a compromise will not satisfy anyone due to the asymmetric reality of family politics.

Morten Løkkegaard stressed that the EU is all about solidarity, so the question is how to practice solidarity in the Union. Just because some have different views on the Social Pillar it does not imply that they are not solidary. In Denmark, we have much to thank the trade unions for, since social partners are able to have a constructive dialogue. Worth noting though, is that one model does not fit all due to cultural, political and economic differences.
– One must simply get its own house in order to create social welfare as well as solidarity. Hence, reforms at national level must take place to be able to increase social integration and combat inequalities. The Social Pillar is not the answer.

Margrethe Husebø discussed the Norwegian model from a business perspective and stressed that if new principles, directives or regulations interfering with the national models were settled, the incentives to create good solutions for businesses and employees are markedly reduced. There is a significant risk that we will not find solutions suited for rapid shift in market and economic conditions if more bureaucracy is put on employers. For example, we know that many companies in the oil service sector have agreed with trade unions during the last years to lower wages for workers on temporary basis. This has been necessary to avoid redundancies and in worst cases bankruptcy. One simply must take into account the national circumstances.

Markus Penttinen highlighted that Nordic trade unions will always be in favor of reforms necessary to enable a flexible development of the labour market to ensure future welfare. But for the internal market to be able to work properly and bring growth to all countries, some common rules are needed. We named the Social Pillar to counter the development with an aggressive growing populism in Europe.
– The Social Pillar will not lead to a harmonization of the labour markets in the EU. It is a question about minimum standards, said Penttinen.

The Nordic employer organizations have moreover written a joint statement on the Social Pillar.


Ladda ner


NEWS Published:

What impact of the Social Pillar on EU prosperity?

The EU’s approach to social policy is currently changing. In November 2017, the European Pillar of Social Rights (the Social Pillar) was proclaimed as a visionary document setting up goals for an upward convergence in this area. In this year’s State of Union address, the president of the EU-commission Jean-Claude Juncker asserted that “It is time we turned the good intentions that we proclaimed at the Gothenburg Social Summit into law”. And, as a matter of fact, this process is well under way.
NEWS Published:

The entrepreneurial perspective is being neglected in the EU digitalisation process

The digital single market is a hot topic in the EU right now. Sweden has plenty of confidence when it comes to digitalisation, which does by its nature transcends all borders. The government’s overall goal is for Sweden to be best in the world at using the opportunities offered by digitalisation. But unfortunately the entrepreneurial perspective usually comes second when the European countries attempts to create a digital inner market.
NEWS Published:

American tariffs hurt Swedish and European industry

"President Trump’s decision to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports is very unfortunate. It will hurt Swedish industry both directly and indirectly", says Carola Lemne, Director General of the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.
NEWS Published:

The EU-commission wants to go big on AI

AI  The US and China are way ahead of Europe regarding development of autonomous computer systems. That disadvantage must change if European business and industry is to retain its competitive edge into the future, writes Olof Erixon, Senior legal counsel.
NEWS Published:

EU – the clearest voice for free trade

In the beginning of May, the Free Market Road Show (FMRS) took place in Stockholm. Jens Hedström, Head of Brussels Office, International Director, Swedish Enterprise, was one of the panellists together with PJ Anders Linder, CEO Axess Foundation, the British economist Richard Teather among others.
NEWS Published:

Sweden should oppose the digital tax proposals

TAXES The Swedish Government should oppose the controversial digital tax proposals from the EU Commission and work with the OECD to find an internationally acceptable solution.
NEWS Published:

Controversial EU tax proposal on digital services causes concern for small exporting economies

TAX The Director Generals for the Swedish, Danish and Finnish business federations have, in a joint letter addressed to the Finance Ministers of their respective countries, expressed their concern for the EU Commissions digital tax plan.
NEWS Published:

Protectionism only produces losers

The impact of globalisation has been positive for most of the world’s population. However, the economic integration of economies also accelerates change which puts increasing pressure on societies to be able to adapt to such change. We need to stand up for the clear advantages of globalisation, while making sure our societies have the flexibility necessary to adapt to rapid changes in technology and labor markets. These were the main conclusion at a seminar about free trade and globalization in times of protectionism, organized by The Society for Business and Politics in the European Parliament.
NEWS Published:

Let’s talk about the losers of protectionism

European politicians have a big role to play in communicating why globalisation matters. We need politicians that are brave enough to talk about the losers of protectionism, not just the losers of globalisation, writes Carola Lemne.
NEWS Published:

The European Commission: Swedish companies best at innovation

Within the framework for the European Commission’s EU Industry Day February 22-23 in Brussels, Teknikföretagen and RISE was chosen to present how Swedish enterprise and academy cooperate around invention under the headline TESTBED Europe, accelerating innovation and strengthening eco-systems. The seminar proved to be one of the events most popular, and gathered experts from all over Europe. The participants all agreed that Sweden is the leading example of innovation, but why?
NEWS Published:

OECDs ambassadors meeting – act for growth and prosperity

January 19th marked the date for BIACs annual meeting with the ambassadors of OECD. This year’s theme was ”Business priorities for OECD action: a call for growth and prosperity” and tackled subjects like entrepreneurship, multilateral framework for trade, tax and investments, creating opportunities for business to create the jobs of the future and developing high quality regulation that strengthens businesses competitiveness. 
NEWS Published:

Trilogue negotiations – striking the right balance between transparency and efficiency

A trilogue is just what it sounds like – a dialogue between three parties. In a European context the three parties in question are the European parliament, the European Commission and the Council. There are advantages to these trilogues; it’s a quicker decision process which can be used ad hoc with the three most important parties present. But the opposition is growing against the increased frequency, particularly because of lack of transparency that trilogues entail.
NEWS Published:

Entrepreneurship crucial for successful companies in Europe

We need a holistic perspective to be able to create a better European ecosystem for entrepreneurs. Innovation is not enough, the products must be commercialised and reach the market if companies are to be able tocreate growth.
NEWS Published:

A framework for free flow of non-personal data in the European Union

COMMENT The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise welcomes this regulation with its aim to ensure the free data flow within the European Union. Europe can no longer afford to keep the Digital Single Market held back by protectionism and fragmentation, says Göran Norén, Head of Department, Industrial Affairs, and Carolina Brånby, Digital Policy expert.
NEWS Published:

Nordic labour market models and the Social Pillar – complementary or colliding?

SOCIAL PILLAR The Nordic employer organizations organised a seminar in Brussels where invited representatives from the EU institutions, industry and trade union discussed their views on the Social Pillar taking into account the Nordic labour market models.
NEWS Published:

Connected consumers: risk or opportunity?

New technology and data-driven innovation create new business models and services that enable companies to help their customers by adjusting their products and become more relevant. At the same time, access to and analysis of data challenges the personal integrity and the view of how integrity should best be safeguarded. How shall development of new services and personalisation be balanced with demands of personal integrity? Do consumers have access to relevant information? And who is responsible for what?
NEWS Published:

Business and politics hand in hand to solve environmental challenges

The world and humanity are facing some of our greatest challenges. More people are using more natural resources. Fish stocks are running the risk of extinction, freshwater resources are far from adequate, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is increasing and biodiversity is becoming depleted. Never before has a creature been able to affect our planet to the extent humanity does today.All of this constitutes major challenges - but there is hope for our future. And many solutions can be found within the business community.
NEWS Published:

The recipe for a competitive EU

The success of the EU’s can be measured largely in the level of exchange in goods, services, people, and capital. The complete implementation of the Single Market is key. Much remains to be done in many areas, such as the free movement of services and labour, eliminating restrictive national processes, regulations and standards, and ensuring that common legislation is applied uniformly and consistently. As long as barriers to the four freedoms remain, European competitiveness will continue to be held back.
NEWS Published:

Trump cannot kill climate hope

As the USA now plans to exit the Paris Climate agreement, the EU and Sweden can have the greatest impact by demonstrating that combining competitiveness and high levels of prosperity with continuing to reduce climate emissions is possible. The entrepreneurial sector will drive climate issues forward, more than policy makers. Technical innovation is advancing quickly in many fields, reducing costs for new technology. Even US President Donald Trump cannot change these facts despite his misguided passion for coal, writes Maria Sunér Fleming, Head of Energy and Climate Policy at the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.
NEWS Published:

Do we need a more social Europe?

Is a “Social Europe” the right medicine to stop growing populism? Can new social rights and social legislation foster growth and jobs? Is the fight against social dumping in fact a pretext for protecting domestic workers? What is the role of the EU and the Member States?