Trilogue negotiations – striking the right balance between transparency and efficiency

NEWS Published

A trilogue is just what it sounds like – a dialogue between three parties. In a European context the three parties in question are the European parliament, the European Commission and the Council. There are advantages to these trilogues; it’s a quicker decision process which can be used ad hoc with the three most important parties present. But the opposition is growing against the increased frequency, particularly because of lack of transparency that trilogues entail.

spn 5 dec
Foto: Leszek Jarosz
Bernd Dittmann from the European Economic and Social Committee employer’s group, Fredrick Federley, MEP (ALDE), Fergal O’Regan Head of unit at the European Ombudsman, and Assya Kavrakova, Director of European Citizen Action Service.

The Society for Politics and Enterprise (SPN), arranged seminar in the European Parliament on the rising frequency of trilogues, and the effect on transparency in the EU legislative process.  The discussion was hosted by SPN chair Fredrick Federley, MEP (ALDE), and the panel included Bernd Dittmann from the European Economic and Social Committee employer’s group, Fergal O’Regan Head of unit at the European Ombudsman, and Assya Kavrakova, Director of European Citizen Action Service.

The trialouges have become one of the most used decision making processes in the European Union, even though they exist outside the ordinary legislative process outlined in the Treaties. Trilogues are unregulated, as far as transparency is concerned, and that makes it difficult for outsiders to understand the decision process and hold the institutions accountable. Access to and information about the legislative process is strictly restricted for citizens, stakeholders and even for politicians outside the small core of trilogue negotiators. 

Transparency is one of the most important issues for the European Ombudsman, and the European Treaties emphasize the need for transparency in the decision-making process. 

- It’s a question of trust for the entire Union. Therefore, I would like to see a proactive transparency, especially at the later stages of the trilogues. Documents should be made public so that citizens can understand what their elected representatives have decided. We need a regular democratic procedure in which we can hold our decision makers accountable, said Fergal O’Regan.

But some things are improving, according to Bernd Dittmann. A review has been made and there is an ongoing debate on how to increase the transparency of the European insitutions. But there is still some ground to be covered, and we should all do our best to contribute to actual changes in procedure.

- We need quick results, which is near impossible without transparent decision making processes. Knowing how the process proceeds is a way to create trust and understanding for the EU machinery. For the same reason we need to know what mandate the decision makers have. National decisions are proceeded by an open political debate which provides clarity on the different viewpoints. There is no such process within the EU, and from this perspective that is troublesome.

The Economic and Social Committee’s report ”Investigation of informal trilogue negotiations since the Lisbon Treaty” was shared with participants at the event. The report is an ambitious overview of the development and current function of trialogues, and it contains quite a bit of criticism, particularly aimed at how the Council deals with transparency.

-This report upset me, Assya Kavrakova said. I was actually shocked by the content. Trilogues have spread to every possible policy area and it is unfathomable that 75 percent of all decisions are made behind closed doors, without any transparency. It is almost putting the entire union at risk. How can we demand democratic processes from new member countries when we as a union do not deliver the same? This certainly raises questions about the EUs legitimacy.

The one elected official in the panel, Fredrick Federley, verified that the trilogues complicate the work of the parliament as well. The members of parliament must rely on having the right network and contacts among the institutions to find out what is being discussed in the closed meetings.

So what can be done? How can we insure a decision process which is both effective and offer transparency and possibility of participation?

Bernd Dittmann’s answer is that to start making improvements in transparency in the Council. The Council secretariat should formulate a mandate and guidelines for transparency. The public must be allowed more access to the views and position of the different parties.

Kavrakova strongly agreed with the closing remark of Dittmann’s statement. The public needs to be given access to the processes, a sort of crowd funding of input for the decision makers. If that does not happen and the citizens are kept in the dark about “the rules of the game”, we risk increasing the mistrust of the European institutions and the EU itself.

Trust, establishment and transparency. The panel kept returning to these three keywords. At a time when EU sceptics keep getting louder and populism is growing, putting an end to the democratic deficit is more important than ever.

News

NEWS Published:

A recovery plan for Europe after COVID-19

EU If companies are to be able to emerge from the crisis and continue to grow, we need to see an ambitious and coordinated recovery plan for the EU as early as possible, write Anna Stellinger, Deputy Director General, and Anders Edholm, Head of EU-office.
NEWS Published:

Necessary actions to mitigate the Corona crisis

TRADE Swedish Enterprise has sent a position paper to EU-commissioners, Members of the European parliament and several others in order to bring the attention to the list of proposals you can find below.
NEWS Published:

EU state aid regulations can save companies and jobs

COMMENT To help Member States preserve companies and jobs during the current coronavirus crisis, the European Commission has rapidly relaxed EU state aid regulations. At the same time, it is important to safeguard equal conditions for both competition and free enterprise, writes competition and state aid expert Stefan Sagebro.
NEWS Published:

Coronavirus crisis: Seven trade actions that need to be taken now

COMMENT The coronavirus outbreak is placing unprecedented pressure on the EU and international trade. The goal should be to lay the foundations for the best possible conditions post-Corona that keeps as many companies – and jobs – viable. We have no time to wait, writes Anna Stellinger, Deputy Director General Confederation of Swedish Enterprise
NEWS Published:

Information on coronavirus / COVID-19 for you as a business owner

CORONA (UPDATED REGULARLY) Due to the recent developments in the spread of the coronavirus, we have summarised the sources where you, as a business owner/operator entrepreneur, can find the latest information.
NEWS Published:

In times of crisis, barriers are not the answer

COMMENT EU must now take powerful measures in the field of trade policy. A constructive measure would be to completely remove import duties on necessary medical equipment, hand soap and disinfectants, imported from third countries, writes Anna Stellinger, Deputy Director General International and EU Affairs.
NEWS Published:

EU industrial strategy: "Now the real work will begin"

COMMENT The European Commission has presented an industrial strategy. This will lay out the course for the coming five years. The strategy presented today is simply the starting point. Now the real work will begin, says Göran Grén, Director Head of Business Policy and Law Division at the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.
NEWS Published:

"Most important a trade agreement with the UK"

FREE TRADE How should the EU relate to major powers such as the US and China? How does the EU best approach the defence of free trade and an open and a favourable investment climate? To find what our Swedish MEPs in the Trade Committee think, we asked Jörgen Warborn (M, EPP) a few questions.
NEWS Published:

"The US and China are blending trade policy with geopolitical goals"

FREE TRADE How should the EU relate to major powers such as the US and China? How does the EU best approach the defence of free trade and an open and a favourable investment climate? To find what our Swedish MEPs in the Trade Committee think, we asked Karin Karlsbro, L, Renew Europe.
NEWS Published:

This is how to shape Europe's digital future

COMMENT The European Commission is launching its strategy for Europe's digital future. “The debate on the surveillance society, the mapping of citizens and the profiling of consumers is an important consideration as we move into this future, writes lawyer Carolina Brånby.
NEWS Published:

A Competitive European Industry

EU The European Commission will present its industrial strategy on 10 March. In response to this, Swedish Enterprise has produced the position paper, "A Competitive European Industry". This summarises the organisation's views on a range of issues.
NEWS Published:

11 exciting climate projects from Sweden

Swedish companies have long been at the forefront of combining sustainability and environmental ambitions with growth and innovation. From fossil-free steel to CO2 capture, Sweden’s businesses are leveraging tomorrow's technology for a greener world. As innovation and climate-smart solutions become an increasingly important element in our competitiveness, we have listed 11 ground-breaking climate projects currently underway in Sweden’s business world.
NEWS Published:

"There are no long term winners in a protectionist world"

EU Anna Stellinger, Deputy Director General International and EU Affairs, believes that the new European Commission must demonstrate that it can manage several issues simultaneously. “It must keep the Union and the single market together, stand up for free movement and maintain its focus on core areas.”
NEWS Published:

Swedish Enterprise about the Green Deal

EU – There are several elements contained in the initiative that will be important for Swedish industry, says Lina Håkansdotter, Head of Sustainability and Infrastructure.
NEWS Published:

Worries over Brussels minimum wage initiative

EU The Swedish Labour Market Council for EU Affairs has sent a letter to Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission. The letter contains several sharp messages to the Commission, where one is that EU lacks competence in the area of pay. 
NEWS Published:

Stellinger on Trade Policy Day: "Protectionism means everyone loses"

INTERNATIONEL TRADE What is the way forward for EU trade policy during these turbulent times? This was the central issue during the European Parliament’s discussions on trade policy. "We live in an entirely new trade world" said Anna Stellinger, Deputy Director General, international and EU affairs.
NEWS Published:

The GDPR alone is insufficient

GDPR The GDPR compromise from 2016 has been shown to have both strengths and weaknesses - particularly from a business perspective. It is vitally important to delivering proper data protection and trust, but it is demanding and costly to adhere to vague and overly-detailed legislation. This creates compelling reasons to discuss how to support compliance and important processing in order to remain technological competitive, says lawyer Carolina Brånby at the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise. The report, entitled “What’s wrong with GDPR?”, is now available in English.
NEWS Published:

Questions vital for the future of the industry

SEMINAR The Swedish Construction Federation and MEP Abir Al-Sahlani (RE) have organised a seminar "Building Europe - Future of work the construction” in the European Parliament.
NEWS Published:

Anna Stellinger: Director of International and EU Affairs at Confederation of Swedish Enterprise

NEW LINE OF WORK Anna Stellinger today takes up the newly created position of Director of International and EU Affairs at the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise. She will also join the management team.
NEWS Published:

Review the Swedish Exemption Regarding Financial Transactions

TAX The VAT exemption regarding financial transactions is often used in Sweden as an argument to raise taxes in the financial sector. However, the exemption is harming the business climate as well as growth and development.