Trilogue negotiations – striking the right balance between transparency and efficiency

NEWS Published

A trilogue is just what it sounds like – a dialogue between three parties. In a European context the three parties in question are the European parliament, the European Commission and the Council. There are advantages to these trilogues; it’s a quicker decision process which can be used ad hoc with the three most important parties present. But the opposition is growing against the increased frequency, particularly because of lack of transparency that trilogues entail.

spn 5 dec
Foto: Leszek Jarosz
Bernd Dittmann from the European Economic and Social Committee employer’s group, Fredrick Federley, MEP (ALDE), Fergal O’Regan Head of unit at the European Ombudsman, and Assya Kavrakova, Director of European Citizen Action Service.

The Society for Politics and Enterprise (SPN), arranged seminar in the European Parliament on the rising frequency of trilogues, and the effect on transparency in the EU legislative process.  The discussion was hosted by SPN chair Fredrick Federley, MEP (ALDE), and the panel included Bernd Dittmann from the European Economic and Social Committee employer’s group, Fergal O’Regan Head of unit at the European Ombudsman, and Assya Kavrakova, Director of European Citizen Action Service.

The trialouges have become one of the most used decision making processes in the European Union, even though they exist outside the ordinary legislative process outlined in the Treaties. Trilogues are unregulated, as far as transparency is concerned, and that makes it difficult for outsiders to understand the decision process and hold the institutions accountable. Access to and information about the legislative process is strictly restricted for citizens, stakeholders and even for politicians outside the small core of trilogue negotiators. 

Transparency is one of the most important issues for the European Ombudsman, and the European Treaties emphasize the need for transparency in the decision-making process. 

- It’s a question of trust for the entire Union. Therefore, I would like to see a proactive transparency, especially at the later stages of the trilogues. Documents should be made public so that citizens can understand what their elected representatives have decided. We need a regular democratic procedure in which we can hold our decision makers accountable, said Fergal O’Regan.

But some things are improving, according to Bernd Dittmann. A review has been made and there is an ongoing debate on how to increase the transparency of the European insitutions. But there is still some ground to be covered, and we should all do our best to contribute to actual changes in procedure.

- We need quick results, which is near impossible without transparent decision making processes. Knowing how the process proceeds is a way to create trust and understanding for the EU machinery. For the same reason we need to know what mandate the decision makers have. National decisions are proceeded by an open political debate which provides clarity on the different viewpoints. There is no such process within the EU, and from this perspective that is troublesome.

The Economic and Social Committee’s report ”Investigation of informal trilogue negotiations since the Lisbon Treaty” was shared with participants at the event. The report is an ambitious overview of the development and current function of trialogues, and it contains quite a bit of criticism, particularly aimed at how the Council deals with transparency.

-This report upset me, Assya Kavrakova said. I was actually shocked by the content. Trilogues have spread to every possible policy area and it is unfathomable that 75 percent of all decisions are made behind closed doors, without any transparency. It is almost putting the entire union at risk. How can we demand democratic processes from new member countries when we as a union do not deliver the same? This certainly raises questions about the EUs legitimacy.

The one elected official in the panel, Fredrick Federley, verified that the trilogues complicate the work of the parliament as well. The members of parliament must rely on having the right network and contacts among the institutions to find out what is being discussed in the closed meetings.

So what can be done? How can we insure a decision process which is both effective and offer transparency and possibility of participation?

Bernd Dittmann’s answer is that to start making improvements in transparency in the Council. The Council secretariat should formulate a mandate and guidelines for transparency. The public must be allowed more access to the views and position of the different parties.

Kavrakova strongly agreed with the closing remark of Dittmann’s statement. The public needs to be given access to the processes, a sort of crowd funding of input for the decision makers. If that does not happen and the citizens are kept in the dark about “the rules of the game”, we risk increasing the mistrust of the European institutions and the EU itself.

Trust, establishment and transparency. The panel kept returning to these three keywords. At a time when EU sceptics keep getting louder and populism is growing, putting an end to the democratic deficit is more important than ever.

News

NEWS Published:

Proposals for competitiveness

REPORT The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise, in co-operation with its experts and membership organizations, has produced concrete proposals for measures to ensure that Europe will maintain its competitiveness in the global arena.
NEWS Published:

How EU-decisions affect Swedish companies

REPORT The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise has evaluated how the major decisions taken within the EU during the last mandate period affect Swedish companies. Our evaluation shows that 24 of the 57 legal acts we have chosen to look at have been positive for Swedish companies.
NEWS Published:

SME-companies in the digital economy

EU 24 million small and mid-sized businesses are the greatest asset within EU. "Regulations must be dealt with to give SME-companies the opportunity to reach their full potential", says  Anna-Lena Bohm, chairman of BusinessEuropes SME:s and Entrepreneurship committee.
NEWS Published:

SME-companies in the digital economy

BUSINESS There are 24 million small and mid-sized businesses, so called SME businesses, in Europe. These companies are a great – if not the greatest – asset when it comes to tackling todays economical and social challenges.
NEWS Published:

The Nordic countries need to block EU assault on tax veto

TAX For countries with a common currency and a limited common budget, it is particularly important to be able to pursue an active national fiscal policy when an external shock is encountered, writes Claes Hammarstedt.
NEWS Published:

Artificial intelligence on everybody’s mind

EVENT Artificial intelligence is on everybody’s mind in the EU capital. The European Commission recently launched its strategy for artificial intelligence, which focuses on promoting research and development of AI across European sectors.
NEWS Published:

AI made in EU

JOINT EFFORT The EU-commission has presented a joint effort with Member States to promote the development and use of artificial intelligence, AI, in Europe. To strengthen AI-technology and uptake in Europe is welcome. Swedish Enterprise believes that the conditions within Europe must be strengthened in order to successfully improve the global competitiveness of our companies. Here are our thoughts and proposals.
NEWS Published:

Swedish expert represents European industry in expert group on AI

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise’s digital expert Carolina Brånby is representing BusinessEurope in the European Commission High Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence, AI HLEG. Their role is drafting ethical guidelines, and to create recommendations on how to strengthen the uptake of AI within the EU.
NEWS Published:

What impact of the Social Pillar on EU prosperity?

The EU’s approach to social policy is currently changing. In November 2017, the European Pillar of Social Rights (the Social Pillar) was proclaimed as a visionary document setting up goals for an upward convergence in this area. In this year’s State of Union address, the president of the EU-commission Jean-Claude Juncker asserted that “It is time we turned the good intentions that we proclaimed at the Gothenburg Social Summit into law”. And, as a matter of fact, this process is well under way.
NEWS Published:

The entrepreneurial perspective is being neglected in the EU digitalisation process

The digital single market is a hot topic in the EU right now. Sweden has plenty of confidence when it comes to digitalisation, which does by its nature transcends all borders. The government’s overall goal is for Sweden to be best in the world at using the opportunities offered by digitalisation. But unfortunately the entrepreneurial perspective usually comes second when the European countries attempts to create a digital inner market.
NEWS Published:

American tariffs hurt Swedish and European industry

"President Trump’s decision to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports is very unfortunate. It will hurt Swedish industry both directly and indirectly", says Carola Lemne, Director General of the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.
NEWS Published:

The EU-commission wants to go big on AI

AI  The US and China are way ahead of Europe regarding development of autonomous computer systems. That disadvantage must change if European business and industry is to retain its competitive edge into the future, writes Olof Erixon, Senior legal counsel.
NEWS Published:

EU – the clearest voice for free trade

In the beginning of May, the Free Market Road Show (FMRS) took place in Stockholm. Jens Hedström, Head of Brussels Office, International Director, Swedish Enterprise, was one of the panellists together with PJ Anders Linder, CEO Axess Foundation, the British economist Richard Teather among others.
NEWS Published:

Sweden should oppose the digital tax proposals

TAXES The Swedish Government should oppose the controversial digital tax proposals from the EU Commission and work with the OECD to find an internationally acceptable solution.
NEWS Published:

Controversial EU tax proposal on digital services causes concern for small exporting economies

TAX The Director Generals for the Swedish, Danish and Finnish business federations have, in a joint letter addressed to the Finance Ministers of their respective countries, expressed their concern for the EU Commissions digital tax plan.
NEWS Published:

Protectionism only produces losers

The impact of globalisation has been positive for most of the world’s population. However, the economic integration of economies also accelerates change which puts increasing pressure on societies to be able to adapt to such change. We need to stand up for the clear advantages of globalisation, while making sure our societies have the flexibility necessary to adapt to rapid changes in technology and labor markets. These were the main conclusion at a seminar about free trade and globalization in times of protectionism, organized by The Society for Business and Politics in the European Parliament.
NEWS Published:

Let’s talk about the losers of protectionism

European politicians have a big role to play in communicating why globalisation matters. We need politicians that are brave enough to talk about the losers of protectionism, not just the losers of globalisation, writes Carola Lemne.
NEWS Published:

The European Commission: Swedish companies best at innovation

Within the framework for the European Commission’s EU Industry Day February 22-23 in Brussels, Teknikföretagen and RISE was chosen to present how Swedish enterprise and academy cooperate around invention under the headline TESTBED Europe, accelerating innovation and strengthening eco-systems. The seminar proved to be one of the events most popular, and gathered experts from all over Europe. The participants all agreed that Sweden is the leading example of innovation, but why?
NEWS Published:

OECDs ambassadors meeting – act for growth and prosperity

January 19th marked the date for BIACs annual meeting with the ambassadors of OECD. This year’s theme was ”Business priorities for OECD action: a call for growth and prosperity” and tackled subjects like entrepreneurship, multilateral framework for trade, tax and investments, creating opportunities for business to create the jobs of the future and developing high quality regulation that strengthens businesses competitiveness. 
NEWS Published:

Trilogue negotiations – striking the right balance between transparency and efficiency

A trilogue is just what it sounds like – a dialogue between three parties. In a European context the three parties in question are the European parliament, the European Commission and the Council. There are advantages to these trilogues; it’s a quicker decision process which can be used ad hoc with the three most important parties present. But the opposition is growing against the increased frequency, particularly because of lack of transparency that trilogues entail.