Uncertain environmental policy

NEWS Published

OPINION The All Party Committee on Environmental Objectives has submitted its final report to the Swedish government. Though this is a broad agreement with clear formulations, it is unfortunately based on wishful thinking and hopes rather than facts and proper documentation, writes Maria Sunér Fleming, Head of Energy and Climate Policy at the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise, who also participated as specialist on the committee.

Maria Sunér Fleming

Maria Sunér Fleming

Foto: Nicklas Mattsson

The All Party Committee on Environmental Objectives has submitted its final report to the Swedish government. The report contains proposals for a comprehensive Swedish climate policy with interim targets set for 2030 and 2040 supplementing the overall objectives for 2045 proposed in the the previously submitted Interim report.

Science has clearly shown the serious impacts relating to climate issues. This demands all-encompassing global policies to reduce GHG emissions at a faster pace, instead of focusing only on emissions within Sweden's borders. The Committee has provided a broad comprehensive cross-party approach to Swedish climate policies, which does provide some clarity.

The Committee’s proposals presume that all countries will contribute to the Paris climate agreement from December 2015, and that comparable policy instruments are introduced in important economies. The conclusions state that Swedish climate policy should be pursued while maintaining international competitiveness, and keeping GHG emissions from Sweden from increasing – also certainly positive.

As a small trade-dependent country, Sweden significantly depends on global developments, requiring us to closely track trends in how other countries implement promised action under the Paris agreement. If we fail in this, the country puts itself at risk of having a nationally oriented climate policy that would have significant negative consequences for social prosperity and competitiveness, while being directly counter productive regarding global climate objectives.

The Committee proposes a target for climate policy of 63 per cent reduction from 1990 levels for those portions of the economy that lie outside the EU ETS system for trading emission allowances, Currently Sweden has cut emissions by 27 per cent compared to 1990. The Committee also proposes that the transport sector should be assigned a specific target for 2030 to reduce GHG emissions by 70 per cent compared to 2010.

The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise has analysed these targets finding them highly ambitious and, at times, approaching wishful thinking. This includes significant uncertainty regarding progress up to 2030. Only 14 years remain to that target date and Sweden does not control many of the parameters required to meet these targets. Reaching these targets will also require significant changes outside Sweden’s borders, including swift global-wide technical development regarding transports, new EU requirements for vehicles, and that the Swedish approach to bio-fuels is accepted internationally.

Crucially, the report fails to consider the sizeable benefit the transport sector brings to social development and its positive effects on the economy and for individuals. The report is premised on the proposition that transports are negative – that they only contribute to greater emissions. But, more transports are essentially a good sign. The road, rail, and sea transport system in Sweden ties the country together, providing our links to the world – for goods and people. This system is a prerequisite for producing goods where it is most efficient, which includes environmental considerations. Having a target for ‘reduced transports’ as a climate solution is therefore deeply concerning. Real solutions lie in technological development – as with introducing alternative fuels that reduce GHG emissions from the transport sector – not in reducing the movement of people or products.

Instead of setting a detailed target for the transport sector, the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise advocates a broad zero-vision aiming for zero emissions from the transport sector by 2045, as a long-term goal. The specific target for the industry, as is now proposed in the Committee report will tend to make climate policy suboptimal, adding costs that have little positive impact. Cost efficiency and maximum global environmental benefit demands flexibility, and industry-specific targets limit flexibility. The Committee’s targets are the result of defective basic data and inadequate consequence analyses of the targets. Clearly, a faulty report.

Maria Sunér Fleming, Head of Energy and Climate Policy at the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.

This article was originally published in Swedish 22 June 2016

News

NEWS Published:

Proposals for competitiveness

REPORT The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise, in co-operation with its experts and membership organizations, has produced concrete proposals for measures to ensure that Europe will maintain its competitiveness in the global arena.
NEWS Published:

How EU-decisions affect Swedish companies

REPORT The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise has evaluated how the major decisions taken within the EU during the last mandate period affect Swedish companies. Our evaluation shows that 24 of the 57 legal acts we have chosen to look at have been positive for Swedish companies.
NEWS Published:

SME-companies in the digital economy

EU 24 million small and mid-sized businesses are the greatest asset within EU. "Regulations must be dealt with to give SME-companies the opportunity to reach their full potential", says  Anna-Lena Bohm, chairman of BusinessEuropes SME:s and Entrepreneurship committee.
NEWS Published:

SME-companies in the digital economy

BUSINESS There are 24 million small and mid-sized businesses, so called SME businesses, in Europe. These companies are a great – if not the greatest – asset when it comes to tackling todays economical and social challenges.
NEWS Published:

The Nordic countries need to block EU assault on tax veto

TAX For countries with a common currency and a limited common budget, it is particularly important to be able to pursue an active national fiscal policy when an external shock is encountered, writes Claes Hammarstedt.
NEWS Published:

Artificial intelligence on everybody’s mind

EVENT Artificial intelligence is on everybody’s mind in the EU capital. The European Commission recently launched its strategy for artificial intelligence, which focuses on promoting research and development of AI across European sectors.
NEWS Published:

AI made in EU

JOINT EFFORT The EU-commission has presented a joint effort with Member States to promote the development and use of artificial intelligence, AI, in Europe. To strengthen AI-technology and uptake in Europe is welcome. Swedish Enterprise believes that the conditions within Europe must be strengthened in order to successfully improve the global competitiveness of our companies. Here are our thoughts and proposals.
NEWS Published:

Swedish expert represents European industry in expert group on AI

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise’s digital expert Carolina Brånby is representing BusinessEurope in the European Commission High Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence, AI HLEG. Their role is drafting ethical guidelines, and to create recommendations on how to strengthen the uptake of AI within the EU.
NEWS Published:

What impact of the Social Pillar on EU prosperity?

The EU’s approach to social policy is currently changing. In November 2017, the European Pillar of Social Rights (the Social Pillar) was proclaimed as a visionary document setting up goals for an upward convergence in this area. In this year’s State of Union address, the president of the EU-commission Jean-Claude Juncker asserted that “It is time we turned the good intentions that we proclaimed at the Gothenburg Social Summit into law”. And, as a matter of fact, this process is well under way.
NEWS Published:

The entrepreneurial perspective is being neglected in the EU digitalisation process

The digital single market is a hot topic in the EU right now. Sweden has plenty of confidence when it comes to digitalisation, which does by its nature transcends all borders. The government’s overall goal is for Sweden to be best in the world at using the opportunities offered by digitalisation. But unfortunately the entrepreneurial perspective usually comes second when the European countries attempts to create a digital inner market.
NEWS Published:

American tariffs hurt Swedish and European industry

"President Trump’s decision to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports is very unfortunate. It will hurt Swedish industry both directly and indirectly", says Carola Lemne, Director General of the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.
NEWS Published:

The EU-commission wants to go big on AI

AI  The US and China are way ahead of Europe regarding development of autonomous computer systems. That disadvantage must change if European business and industry is to retain its competitive edge into the future, writes Olof Erixon, Senior legal counsel.
NEWS Published:

EU – the clearest voice for free trade

In the beginning of May, the Free Market Road Show (FMRS) took place in Stockholm. Jens Hedström, Head of Brussels Office, International Director, Swedish Enterprise, was one of the panellists together with PJ Anders Linder, CEO Axess Foundation, the British economist Richard Teather among others.
NEWS Published:

Sweden should oppose the digital tax proposals

TAXES The Swedish Government should oppose the controversial digital tax proposals from the EU Commission and work with the OECD to find an internationally acceptable solution.
NEWS Published:

Controversial EU tax proposal on digital services causes concern for small exporting economies

TAX The Director Generals for the Swedish, Danish and Finnish business federations have, in a joint letter addressed to the Finance Ministers of their respective countries, expressed their concern for the EU Commissions digital tax plan.
NEWS Published:

Protectionism only produces losers

The impact of globalisation has been positive for most of the world’s population. However, the economic integration of economies also accelerates change which puts increasing pressure on societies to be able to adapt to such change. We need to stand up for the clear advantages of globalisation, while making sure our societies have the flexibility necessary to adapt to rapid changes in technology and labor markets. These were the main conclusion at a seminar about free trade and globalization in times of protectionism, organized by The Society for Business and Politics in the European Parliament.
NEWS Published:

Let’s talk about the losers of protectionism

European politicians have a big role to play in communicating why globalisation matters. We need politicians that are brave enough to talk about the losers of protectionism, not just the losers of globalisation, writes Carola Lemne.
NEWS Published:

The European Commission: Swedish companies best at innovation

Within the framework for the European Commission’s EU Industry Day February 22-23 in Brussels, Teknikföretagen and RISE was chosen to present how Swedish enterprise and academy cooperate around invention under the headline TESTBED Europe, accelerating innovation and strengthening eco-systems. The seminar proved to be one of the events most popular, and gathered experts from all over Europe. The participants all agreed that Sweden is the leading example of innovation, but why?
NEWS Published:

OECDs ambassadors meeting – act for growth and prosperity

January 19th marked the date for BIACs annual meeting with the ambassadors of OECD. This year’s theme was ”Business priorities for OECD action: a call for growth and prosperity” and tackled subjects like entrepreneurship, multilateral framework for trade, tax and investments, creating opportunities for business to create the jobs of the future and developing high quality regulation that strengthens businesses competitiveness. 
NEWS Published:

Trilogue negotiations – striking the right balance between transparency and efficiency

A trilogue is just what it sounds like – a dialogue between three parties. In a European context the three parties in question are the European parliament, the European Commission and the Council. There are advantages to these trilogues; it’s a quicker decision process which can be used ad hoc with the three most important parties present. But the opposition is growing against the increased frequency, particularly because of lack of transparency that trilogues entail.