What impact of the Social Pillar on EU prosperity?

NEWS Published

The EU’s approach to social policy is currently changing. In November 2017, the European Pillar of Social Rights (the Social Pillar) was proclaimed as a visionary document setting up goals for an upward convergence in this area. In this year’s State of Union address, the president of the EU-commission Jean-Claude Juncker asserted that “It is time we turned the good intentions that we proclaimed at the Gothenburg Social Summit into law”. And, as a matter of fact, this process is well under way.

Mr Jutte, Mr Karlsson, MEP Federley
Foto: J Hedström

The potential effect of this new development was the topic of a seminar held on Tuesday 16 October titled “What impact of the Social Pillar on EU prosperity?” Following the presentation of the the report “The European Social Pillar: A Threat to Welfare and Prosperity? by Professor Nils Karlson (Ratio Institute)”, a lively panel discussion was held by MEP Fredrick Federley (ALDE), and Jeroen Jutte, Head of the unit Employment and social governance at DG EMPL, with Dr. Gabriella Sebardt, Director Social Affairs at the Confederation Swedish Enterprise, acting as moderator. The event was hosted by the latter organisation in collaboration with the Society for Politics and Business (Sällskapet för Näringsliv och Politik – SPN).

Dr. Sebardt started the discussion by confirming that signs had been visible well before the Gothenburg Summit, prompting joint actions by the Swedish social partners.

Professor Karlson elaborated on the Social Pillar’s possible consequences for the direction in which the EU is heading. “The Social Pillar will not only affect member states’ unique welfare systems but will also change their labour market models”, Karlson said. Setting objectives at the EU level legitimises EU legislation, rendering the subsidiarity principle a tool for centralisation, he contended. In the short-term, this will damage specifically the Scandinavian and Anglo-Saxon labour market models but in the long-term, it will disfavour all member states, threatening both prosperity and welfare. Instead of a one-size-fits-all-policy, the EU should encourage reforms in member states with weak governance, fragile welfare states, and uncertain labour markets. Such institutional competition allows for innovation (and policy learning) as well as accountability, the latter being important to ward off populist EU-critical movements.

Mr. Jutte painted a more visionary picture of the Social Pillar. He emphasized the importance of European competiveness when confronted by demographic challenges, global actors, and digitalisation’s impact on the labour force. Faced by these challenges, the EU needs to keep its global role and to strengthen growth by creating a European social dimension. Furthermore, the Social Pillar will not only benefit all member states, but also create an advantage for Swedish companies wanting to establish themselves in an eastern member state. According to Jutte, some member states need the Social Pillar due to uncertainty in their labour markets. “It is a shared commitment”, Jutte said. This, according to Jutte, will not go against the Swedish model – that is just a “false contradiction”. On the contrary, the Social Pillar was inspired by the Nordic and Swedish systems, thus Sweden should be pleased to spread this vital model.

MEP Federley was strongly critical of the Social Pillar and pointed out the difference between “Europe as a super state”, as phrased by the leader of ALDE-group Verhofstadt, and “federalism” as it ought be with distinct levels of competence. Federley posed the question why the EU should present one universal solution for all the member states, when some states already have well-functioning labour markets. According to Federley, the EU should instead advice those member states that “don’t do their homework” and encourage them to adopt better labour market systems with, for instance, regulation by collective agreements. The Social Pillar will not only give the populist groups more ammunition according to Federley, but eventually also risk tearing the union apart.

The discussion also had lively input from the audience on how the Social Pillar will impact different actors within the EU. Historically, the EU has always had a social dimension with some conferred powers in the area of social policy. Yet recently, the proposed directives are becoming far more detailed, leading to questions about whether the Social Pillar could interfere too much with well-functioning national labour-market systems. This is the backdrop to the seminar and the reason for its topical question: what impact will this new development have on European prosperity going forward?

Aras Amin

News

NEWS Published:

Swedish expert represents European industry in expert group on AI

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise’s digital expert Carolina Brånby is representing BusinessEurope in the European Commission High Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence, AI HLEG. Their role is drafting ethical guidelines, and to create recommendations on how to strengthen the uptake of AI within the EU.
NEWS Published:

What impact of the Social Pillar on EU prosperity?

The EU’s approach to social policy is currently changing. In November 2017, the European Pillar of Social Rights (the Social Pillar) was proclaimed as a visionary document setting up goals for an upward convergence in this area. In this year’s State of Union address, the president of the EU-commission Jean-Claude Juncker asserted that “It is time we turned the good intentions that we proclaimed at the Gothenburg Social Summit into law”. And, as a matter of fact, this process is well under way.
NEWS Published:

The entrepreneurial perspective is being neglected in the EU digitalisation process

The digital single market is a hot topic in the EU right now. Sweden has plenty of confidence when it comes to digitalisation, which does by its nature transcends all borders. The government’s overall goal is for Sweden to be best in the world at using the opportunities offered by digitalisation. But unfortunately the entrepreneurial perspective usually comes second when the European countries attempts to create a digital inner market.
NEWS Published:

American tariffs hurt Swedish and European industry

"President Trump’s decision to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports is very unfortunate. It will hurt Swedish industry both directly and indirectly", says Carola Lemne, Director General of the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.
NEWS Published:

The EU-commission wants to go big on AI

AI  The US and China are way ahead of Europe regarding development of autonomous computer systems. That disadvantage must change if European business and industry is to retain its competitive edge into the future, writes Olof Erixon, Senior legal counsel.
NEWS Published:

EU – the clearest voice for free trade

In the beginning of May, the Free Market Road Show (FMRS) took place in Stockholm. Jens Hedström, Head of Brussels Office, International Director, Swedish Enterprise, was one of the panellists together with PJ Anders Linder, CEO Axess Foundation, the British economist Richard Teather among others.
NEWS Published:

Sweden should oppose the digital tax proposals

TAXES The Swedish Government should oppose the controversial digital tax proposals from the EU Commission and work with the OECD to find an internationally acceptable solution.
NEWS Published:

Controversial EU tax proposal on digital services causes concern for small exporting economies

TAX The Director Generals for the Swedish, Danish and Finnish business federations have, in a joint letter addressed to the Finance Ministers of their respective countries, expressed their concern for the EU Commissions digital tax plan.
NEWS Published:

Protectionism only produces losers

The impact of globalisation has been positive for most of the world’s population. However, the economic integration of economies also accelerates change which puts increasing pressure on societies to be able to adapt to such change. We need to stand up for the clear advantages of globalisation, while making sure our societies have the flexibility necessary to adapt to rapid changes in technology and labor markets. These were the main conclusion at a seminar about free trade and globalization in times of protectionism, organized by The Society for Business and Politics in the European Parliament.
NEWS Published:

Let’s talk about the losers of protectionism

European politicians have a big role to play in communicating why globalisation matters. We need politicians that are brave enough to talk about the losers of protectionism, not just the losers of globalisation, writes Carola Lemne.
NEWS Published:

The European Commission: Swedish companies best at innovation

Within the framework for the European Commission’s EU Industry Day February 22-23 in Brussels, Teknikföretagen and RISE was chosen to present how Swedish enterprise and academy cooperate around invention under the headline TESTBED Europe, accelerating innovation and strengthening eco-systems. The seminar proved to be one of the events most popular, and gathered experts from all over Europe. The participants all agreed that Sweden is the leading example of innovation, but why?
NEWS Published:

OECDs ambassadors meeting – act for growth and prosperity

January 19th marked the date for BIACs annual meeting with the ambassadors of OECD. This year’s theme was ”Business priorities for OECD action: a call for growth and prosperity” and tackled subjects like entrepreneurship, multilateral framework for trade, tax and investments, creating opportunities for business to create the jobs of the future and developing high quality regulation that strengthens businesses competitiveness. 
NEWS Published:

Trilogue negotiations – striking the right balance between transparency and efficiency

A trilogue is just what it sounds like – a dialogue between three parties. In a European context the three parties in question are the European parliament, the European Commission and the Council. There are advantages to these trilogues; it’s a quicker decision process which can be used ad hoc with the three most important parties present. But the opposition is growing against the increased frequency, particularly because of lack of transparency that trilogues entail.
NEWS Published:

Entrepreneurship crucial for successful companies in Europe

We need a holistic perspective to be able to create a better European ecosystem for entrepreneurs. Innovation is not enough, the products must be commercialised and reach the market if companies are to be able tocreate growth.
NEWS Published:

A framework for free flow of non-personal data in the European Union

COMMENT The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise welcomes this regulation with its aim to ensure the free data flow within the European Union. Europe can no longer afford to keep the Digital Single Market held back by protectionism and fragmentation, says Göran Norén, Head of Department, Industrial Affairs, and Carolina Brånby, Digital Policy expert.
NEWS Published:

Nordic labour market models and the Social Pillar – complementary or colliding?

SOCIAL PILLAR The Nordic employer organizations organised a seminar in Brussels where invited representatives from the EU institutions, industry and trade union discussed their views on the Social Pillar taking into account the Nordic labour market models.
NEWS Published:

Connected consumers: risk or opportunity?

New technology and data-driven innovation create new business models and services that enable companies to help their customers by adjusting their products and become more relevant. At the same time, access to and analysis of data challenges the personal integrity and the view of how integrity should best be safeguarded. How shall development of new services and personalisation be balanced with demands of personal integrity? Do consumers have access to relevant information? And who is responsible for what?
NEWS Published:

Business and politics hand in hand to solve environmental challenges

The world and humanity are facing some of our greatest challenges. More people are using more natural resources. Fish stocks are running the risk of extinction, freshwater resources are far from adequate, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is increasing and biodiversity is becoming depleted. Never before has a creature been able to affect our planet to the extent humanity does today.All of this constitutes major challenges - but there is hope for our future. And many solutions can be found within the business community.
 
NEWS Published:

The recipe for a competitive EU

The success of the EU’s can be measured largely in the level of exchange in goods, services, people, and capital. The complete implementation of the Single Market is key. Much remains to be done in many areas, such as the free movement of services and labour, eliminating restrictive national processes, regulations and standards, and ensuring that common legislation is applied uniformly and consistently. As long as barriers to the four freedoms remain, European competitiveness will continue to be held back.
NEWS Published:

Trump cannot kill climate hope

As the USA now plans to exit the Paris Climate agreement, the EU and Sweden can have the greatest impact by demonstrating that combining competitiveness and high levels of prosperity with continuing to reduce climate emissions is possible. The entrepreneurial sector will drive climate issues forward, more than policy makers. Technical innovation is advancing quickly in many fields, reducing costs for new technology. Even US President Donald Trump cannot change these facts despite his misguided passion for coal, writes Maria Sunér Fleming, Head of Energy and Climate Policy at the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.